3 ms·
I'm honestly struggling to understand your position. You believe that there are true moral absolutes, but that they should not be communicated in the culture a
by felixgallo 9mo ago
I'm honestly struggling to understand your position. You believe that there are true moral absolutes, but that they should not be communicated in the culture at all costs?
- joshuamcginnis 9mo agoI believe there are moral absolutes and not including them in the AI constitution (for example, like the US Constitution "All Men Are Created Equal") is dangerous and even more dangerous is allowing a top AI operator define moral and ethics based on relativist standards, which as I've said elsewhere, history has shown to have deadly consequences.
- felixgallo 9mo agoNo, I read your words the first time, I just don't understand. What would you have written differently, can you provide a concrete example?
- joshuamcginnis 9mo agoI don’t how to explain it to you any different. I’m arguing for a different philosophy to be applied when constructing the llm guardrails. There may be a lot of overlap in how the rules are manifested in the short run.
- felixgallo 9mo agoYou can explain it differently by providing a concrete example. Just saying "the philosophy should be different" is not informative. Different in what specific way? Can you give an example of a guiding statement that you think is wrong in the original document, and an example of the guiding statement that you would provide instead? That might be illuminative and/or persuasive.
- alwillis 9mo ago> like the US Constitution "All Men Are Created Equal" You know this statement only applied to white, male landowners, right? It took 133 years for women to gain the right to vote from when the Constitution was ratified.
- pc86 9mo agoIs this supposed to be a zinger or something? What is your point?