6 ms·
To quote you: > here is no RL for programming languages. and > Either RL works & you have evidence This is just so completely wrong, and here is the evidenc
by nl 9mo ago
To quote you:
> here is no RL for programming languages.
and
> Either RL works & you have evidence
This is just so completely wrong, and here is the evidence.
I think everyone in this thread is just surprised you don't seem to know this.
Haven't you seen the hundreds of job ads for people to write code for LLMs to train on?
- measurablefunc 9mo agoYou're not going to get less confused by doubling down. None of your claims are valid & this is because you haven't actually tried to do what you're suggesting. Taking a grammar & compiler & RLing will get you nowhere.