5 ms·

IPv6 doesn't "lack" NAT. There is nothing preventing you from using ULA addresses inside your network (IPv6's version of RFC-1918) and then running NAT for thos

IPv6 doesn't "lack" NAT. There is nothing preventing you from using ULA addresses inside your network (IPv6's version of RFC-1918) and then running NAT for those addresses on your router. IPv6 just doesn't _need_ NAT, but it is still an option.

everdrive 9mo ago
I just want to go to my devices and set an easy human-readable address. I don't want to setup ULAs.
- MaKey 9mo ago
  fd00:1337::1, here you go! This address is the equivalent to a private IPv4 address and human-readable.