3 ms·

You seem to be arguing in bad faith, so this will be my last reply. It does not persist today; I removed it. It occured once, 10 years ago, and again, a few mo

You seem to be arguing in bad faith, so this will be my last reply. It does not persist today; I removed it. It occured once, 10 years ago, and again, a few months ago.

brigandish 9mo ago
"Arguing in bad faith" - what would that actually mean? Would it be the same as using a sock puppet to push an agenda? That wasn't me, that's what I'm pointing out and you're dismissing for no good reason. Regardless: - The page is still titled "Constitution…" when the opening paragraph contains "The name "Constitution of Medina" is misleading as the text did not establish a state." Make that make sense. - "and the first "Constitution"" is still in the page It persists. Now, what I might consider bad faith is: - being unwilling to answer simple, straightforward questions, which is apt, considering Socrates was an Athenian - having such an interest in the page that you claim you made edits - not checking properly and thus thinking this only happened twice, and wasn't part of attritional arguments, rollbacks, edits and counter-edits Wikipedia must be alright if one does not wish to see a problem.