2 ms·
No, the amount of water conserved through these measures was absolutely meaningless even at scale. You are talking about a fraction of a fraction of a percent o
by stouset 9mo ago
No, the amount of water conserved through these measures was absolutely meaningless even at scale. You are talking about a fraction of a fraction of a percent of use.
- awesome_dude 9mo ago> So, more likely, 2 or 3 glasses of water :-)
- trollbridge 9mo agoYeah. Farmers measure water use in acre-feet and assess flows at thousands of gallons per minute range. The food in your plate consumes far more water than a glass of water. If anything, more water and less food eaten would be a good water conservation measure.