3 ms·
You're an insufferable cunt because you're failing to read tone. Most people would understand that from reading my comments. I guess this is a failure to commun
by messe 9mo ago
You're an insufferable cunt because you're failing to read tone. Most people would understand that from reading my comments. I guess this is a failure to communicate on my part to you.
You're coming across as someone who is arguing for the sake of arguing. Which I enjoy in many settings (love a good pointless argument in a pub, where nobody wins but both sides rile each other up).
Here, it's just... why bother?
- JasonADrury 9mo agoI'm not failing to read tone, I'm just trying to genuinely engage in spite of your trolling. The criticism pointed at me just seems absurd in a world where it's not unusual for heads of state to announce their intention to cut off the balls of a opposition leader if they can find him, https://x.com/mkainerugaba/status/2013331792506298533 https://x.com/mkainerugaba/status/2013331792506298533 This is the rhetoric being wielded, and it's being wielded by people who do mean what they say. This is the nature of politics being discussed, it seems bizarre to stick your head in the sand and ignore that. The world will not magically become a better place if HN users suddenly decide to pretend that violence does not exist and does not play a significant role in politics. This is simply what conversations involving armed conflict look like. On HN, we should hopefully still be able to discuss these things from a more intellectually curious point of view.