5 ms·
That's a pretty weird threat model. Like, yeah commands you run on your machine can expose information about that machine.
by NewJazz 9mo ago
That's a pretty weird threat model. Like, yeah commands you run on your machine can expose information about that machine.
- mbreese 9mo agoEspecially as if someone is able to capture ifconfig data, they can probably send a curl request to a malicious web server and expose the NAT IP as well.
- NewJazz 9mo agoOr if you happened to curl ipinfo Or if you had a script that did that and put the public v4 address in your taskbar.
- theamk 9mo ago> Or if you had a script that did that and put the public v4 address in your taskbar. do people still do that? Dynamic DNS is offered by so many providers now...
- account42 9mo agoJust because you can think of scenarios where the IPv4 setup doesn't make a different doesn't discount that there are scenarios where it does. Someone being able to observer some state is a different model from someone being able to perform actions on the system and the former has many more realistic scenarios in addition to the ones of the latter.
- theamk 9mo agoPeople post their ifconfig data all the time, example: https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=402315 https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=402315
- theamk 9mo agoOnly in IPv6 world... in IPv4, it's all safe
- NewJazz 9mo agoNope, iproute can still show your Mac address. And a curl ipinfo.io can show your public v4 address.
- theamk 9mo agoMac address is absolutely safe in IPv4 world - the only info it gives is the network card manufacturer. And people don't usually share "curl ipinfo.io" output unless they plan to share their external IP (unlike "ifconfig" output, which is one of the first things you want to share for any sort of networking problems)
- NewJazz 9mo agoSee the top comment in this thread: Target #2 [IPv6] gives aways 90% of the game at attacking it (we even leak some device specific information, so you know precisely where it's weak points are) You may not consider Mac address to he important, but the context of this conversation did bring it up. Of course they forgot the fact that most v6 addressing doesn't expose Mac addresses anymore.