3 ms·
Wait so who is being dishonest, the old article, the new one, or both?
by jama211 9mo ago
Wait so who is being dishonest, the old article, the new one, or both?
- LegitShady 9mo agoyes!
- nandomrumber 9mo agoThere’s ample dishonesty to go round, no one has to miss out if they don’t want to. Arguably, there are an infinite number of things that are dishonest, and only a finite number of things that can be honest at any given moment. Therefore one can honestly say that there are effectively zero honest things, and the entirety of human thought and speech, the noosphere as it where, is the singular dishonesty. The dishonest-gularity.
- saghm 9mo agoI'm not sure that "effectively zero" is quite right; "approximately zero" seems more correct. And on that note, there are also approximately zero instances in the history of the universe where someone has responded to your comment, but hey look, I'm doing it now!
- jama211 9mo agoI didn’t find this particularly helpful if I’m honest
- direwolf20 9mo agoBoth!
- lern_too_spel 9mo agoI only found one article. GP linked to the data that the article is based on, showing a day when California was almost drought-free but still had abnormally dry areas.