How exactly is it a backwards reading of the data? Or are you trying to insulting me? I never said the title is incorrect so I'm not sure what you're trying to

How exactly is it a backwards reading of the data? Or are you trying to insulting me? I never said the title is incorrect so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. It's not wishful thinking. I actually looked at the trends instead of a single data point to reinforce my already decided conclusion. I also read the article and followed the percentages instead of assuming the values were all absolute. This is what I mean by reading the data backwards.