4 ms·
It’s a tiny country with very few people, it’s obviously not “sovereign” under the classical definition of sovereign. I no longer subscribe to the modern defini
by pfannkuchen 9mo ago
It’s a tiny country with very few people, it’s obviously not “sovereign” under the classical definition of sovereign. I no longer subscribe to the modern definition because I believe it is a twisting of language to make it appear that many nations are not in fact vassals of the American empire (Germany, for example).
To illustrate, if Greenland wanted to leave Denmark but Denmark didn’t want it to, could it? No, therefore it isn’t sovereign.
- 47282847 9mo agoHuh? I think you are confusing sovereignty and autonomy. And, yes, currently, on legal basis (sovereignty), Greenland could decide to leave Denmark.