3 ms·
>If I sneak a nude photo of you and use some "AI" to add a funny hat and then spread it, would you be OK with that? How is this even vaguely related? I'm a rea
by JasonADrury 9mo ago
>If I sneak a nude photo of you and use some "AI" to add a funny hat and then spread it, would you be OK with that?
How is this even vaguely related? I'm a real person, but we're presumably discussing people who do not exist.
- cess11 9mo agoAnd kids aren't?
- JasonADrury 9mo agoNo? That's the whole point. The people advocating for AI generated child pornography are generally not advocating for AI generated child pornography portraying real children.
- nilum 9mo agoAnd I'm sure no children will be exposed to this. You people are fucking sick.
- cess11 9mo agoRight, so as long as the photo is manipulated you're OK with it being distributed. Do you have kids?
- JasonADrury 9mo ago>Right, so as long as the photo is manipulated you're OK with it being distributed. Moving the goalposts from "AI-generated" to "manipulated" is just silly on your part. >Do you have kids? Yes.
- tanseydavid 9mo agoNo goalposts got moved. A previous post asked: "Is it OK to 'grok' out simulated undressings of small children because the image technically no longer depict them and instead are fantasy?" And then YOU answered with the following: > Why would it not be OK? There is nobody being harmed.
- Drupon 9mo ago>portraying real children Where do you think the training data came from, you pedophilic dolt? If you have kids and have posted their image online, some dude is cranking it to an image inspired by them, with your enthusiastic consent apparently. Bleak!
- JasonADrury 9mo agoIf you're specifically advocating for a CP-generating AI that allows you to generated pictures of specific people, that's on you man.