3 ms·
> The US isn't going to passively give up its hold on the world order. You don't think this would trigger a world war? They are literally right in the middle o
by r_p4rk 9mo ago
> The US isn't going to passively give up its hold on the world order. You don't think this would trigger a world war?
They are literally right in the middle of imploding their soft power; so maybe you are right about passively giving it up when they're actively doing so instead?
- g_delgado14 9mo agowould you call annexing greenland or invading venezuela passive?