2 ms·
Your point is fair, but it rests on a major assumption I'd question: that the only limit lies with the user, and the tooling itself has none. What if it’s more
by terabytest 9mo ago
Your point is fair, but it rests on a major assumption I'd question: that the only limit lies with the user, and the tooling itself has none. What if it’s more like “you can’t squeeze blood from a stone”? That is, agentic coding may simply have no greater potential than what I've already tried. To be fair I haven't gone all the way in trying to make it work but, even if some minor workarounds exist, the full promise being hyped might not be realistically attainable.
- linesofcode 9mo agoHow can one judge potential without fully understanding or having used it to its full potential? I don’t think agentic programming is some promised land of instant code without bugs. It’s just a force multiplier for what you can do.
- aban-m 9mo agoThe point is precisely this. How do you know you have used it to its full potential? "You're holding it wrong" has no limits.