4 ms·
Of course it positively contributes. It's the first comment to say that it's a silly way of encoding the form as utf-8 when utf8="✘" will also do the same thing
by anjc 14y ago
Of course it positively contributes. It's the first comment to say that it's a silly way of encoding the form as utf-8 when utf8="✘" will also do the same thing, even though it's counterintuitive.
- jerf 14y agoThat is actually what I was going for; the humor attempt was a bonus.
- anjc 14y agoConstructiveHumour=✓ Wait, true...true
- Evbn 14y agoIt is only counterintuitive because you arbitrarily assigned a different type (boolean, with members you made up) instead respecting that any utf8 character fits the utf8 type. X is used variously as true and false in Different languages, so why would you assume it means false in a language you have never used?
- anjc 14y agoWell i didn't make it up, but yeah i get your point. I didn't mean that i'd assume it means false, but it's still clearly counterintuitive to use a tick to encode as utf-8 when any character at all will do. A tick has an opposite, an X, a snowman (as in the Rails case) doesn't.
- arcatek 14y agoI have already seen a website which use "ie=☠" in the URL.