4 ms·
>I don't think that anyone is harmed in any meaningful way by reading her discussions about hypothetical sexual situations She advocates for the value of AI ge
by Drupon 9mo ago
>I don't think that anyone is harmed in any meaningful way by reading her discussions about hypothetical sexual situations
She advocates for the value of AI generated CSAM, and her hypotheticals are attempts at deluded rationalization, the rationalization of could easily sway the actions of others. When I read her rationalizations and hypothetical moral scenarios, I am just reminded of the arguments from the New Left, including many of the voices of the French petition to remove the age of consent, that offered specious sophistry to not just sway others into allowing them to prey on children, but to encourage others with similar predilections to do so without moral qualms.
A good specific example was the placing of orphans in the homes of known sex offenders in East Germany, with the rationalization that it's better than the orphans endure a bit of sexual impropriety than to suffer negligence, which is a very Aella style argument.
- defrost 9mo agoCan you link to the tweet / blog post in which Aella advocated for the actual placement of real children with known sex offenders?
- Drupon 9mo agoYou think Aella lived in East Germany? Obviously I was giving an example of a different situation in which her kind of specious moral reasoning resulted in the enablement of child sexual abuse.
- defrost 9mo agoObviously I didn't think Aella lives in East Germany for a single moment. I was interested in your reasoning as you appeared to be off on a tangent making what is known as a strawman argument.
- Drupon 9mo agoIf you cannot see the shared characteristics of the two cases, then I really have nothing to say to you. It would be impossible to sufficiently simplify the analogy. In the future, if you don't understand, ask for clarification rather than wasting my time with a disingenuous question that requires a full comment round trip to get past.
- JuniperMesos 9mo ago> She advocates for the value of AI generated CSAM, and her hypotheticals are attempts at deluded rationalization, the rationalization of could easily sway the actions of others. Why specifically is her argument wrong?