4 ms·
https://www.mcmaster.com https://www.mcmaster.com 2022 post about it. 1400 points. ~500 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32976978 https://news.y
by hu3 9mo ago
https://www.mcmaster.com https://www.mcmaster.com
2022 post about it. 1400 points. ~500 comments:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32976978 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32976978
- benrutter 9mo agoNot the prettiest but absolutely amazing to use! I'm sure web devs are laughing at me right now, but I genuinely didn't realise websites with that many images etc could actually be that fast.
- diordiderot 9mo agoI would recommend comparing to https://next-faster.vercel.app/ https://next-faster.vercel.app/ NextFaster feels faster than McMaster IMHO
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- jwxz 9mo ago~$500 for hosting that site feels insane to me [0]. I feel like a single $10 VPS could handle that load. [0] https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#costs https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#...
- another_twist 9mo agoThe extra 490 saved isnt worth the optimization. headache
- hu3 9mo agoCan't agree. That website is much simpler. Just a static list of images and text. There's no complex, dynamic filter. And no special rendering per type of item. It's a glorified tumbler since the only dynamic part looks like the shopping cart. Everything else is pre-rendered from what I saw in code. For static content like that I would have used Astro which is the golden standard.