>i feel like he's insinuating the constitution is wrong because it's inherently racist and elitist. The constitution suggests that "all men are created equal".

>i feel like he's insinuating the constitution is wrong because it's inherently racist and elitist. The constitution suggests that "all men are created equal". it sadly needed several revisions to define what "man" is, though. And then some 150 years before we expanded "man" to represent "humanity" instead of "male". The constitution isn't racist/sexist by the wording of its law, but the interpretations arguably were. And maybe are. Nothing either good nor bad but thinking makes it so. We had to spend a long, long time thinking and re-thinking this over. Sadly the trend as of late is to stop thinking altogether. I hope that changes.