3 ms·

That’s not part of the open source definition. You can claim the open source code isn’t Windows 11, but you can’t complain the code isn’t open source.

• antisol 9mo ago
  > you can’t complain the code isn’t open source (unless, of course, the code isn't licensed under an OSI-approved license. Parent didn't actually specify which license the hypothetical not-windows-11 was being "open sourced" under, so we can't actually say for sure whether this hypothetical release is open source or not) </pedantry>
  • YetAnotherNick 9mo ago
    > I feel like we need more awareness on what is open-source and how does it work. This is NOT open source.
    • deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
  • nailer 9mo ago
    Yes that’s correct. I’m imagining it’s the Apache license like the X code, which is indeed an open source license.