> In any case in the context of US civil rights, the Indians (native) are a far more reasonable conclusion than Indian (Asian) Why? There's a very direct link

> In any case in the context of US civil rights, the Indians (native) are a far more reasonable conclusion than Indian (Asian) Why? There's a very direct link between India and the US civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1959_visit_by_Martin_Luther_King_Jr._to_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1959_visit_by_Martin_Luther_Ki... I understand your confusion and I didn't downvote you. But the answer to "Which Indian?" is at the very least a coin flip in this context.