3 ms·

Let my little assistant help you out on this topic. Below is a timeline cross-reference of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize (2009) and U.S. wars / major military acti

by vee-kay 9mo ago

Let my little assistant help you out on this topic. Below is a timeline cross-reference of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize (2009) and U.S. wars / major military actions. Summary: It is overwhelmingly likely (and effectively certain) that Obama knew he was overseeing active wars and new military escalations before he went to collect the Nobel Peace Prize. https://chatgpt.com/s/t_696eb7d8344c81918204cafb96b10f9a https://chatgpt.com/s/t_696eb7d8344c81918204cafb96b10f9a As for Trump, I fear he is just getting started. His actions (and the repercussions on the nation and the world) are gonna get a lot worse, I'm afraid.

netsharc 9mo ago
> Bottom line: > Yes — it is overwhelmingly likely (and effectively certain) that Obama knew he was overseeing active wars and new military escalations before he went to collect the Nobel Peace Prize. So your "assistant" supports my reply, he was fully aware of that and acknowledged this. And in the speech you didn't read, he went into how war came as naturally as the first man, and how some wars are necessary and "just". Indeed Ukraine is at the moment shooting back at Russian conscripts... And since we're allowing AI responses look at the answer of my second question: https://gemini.google.com/share/57839224db00 https://gemini.google.com/share/57839224db00 But I'm sure you would've been a better at politicking than Obama's team!
- vee-kay 9mo ago
  All Obama had to do - to have some modicum of respect by the world (despite him doing wars, but world already is accustomed to US being involved in wars, meh) - was to reject the Nobel Peace Prize. But he failed. And by doing the opposite, despite all his idealistic "humanitarian" speeches, he simply proved himself as a warmongering hypocrite to the world. In that aspect, Trump did try desperately to play "the Big Brother, the peacemaker" role in conflicts across the world, in an obvious (childish) attempt to outdo Obama's (dubious) legacy, but he failed. So he's dropped his mask, the velvet gloves are off, and it is every man (country) for himself (itself) as the King of the Hill decides which hill to stake his next flag on. Oily toy has been seemingly grabbed, and now the King has set his eyes Northwards. And that bodes ill for those who question his will. Because a troublemaker child may smash or throw some things when he has a temper tantrum.
  - netsharc 9mo ago
    Your reply has proven my last sentence correct, and then some... Today I was listening to a podcast where the host said his internal monologue when a commenter on the Internet upsets him with a dumb comment is "you know what, they're probably 12 years old.". I think I'll adapt that idea. Because who else gets told A and immediately argues "Let me tell you, I'm sure Not A is correct/would've been the better move!", twice. Maybe someone who again didn't bother to read the links, because of course he's smarter than that, considering he's already smarter than Obama's team!
    - vee-kay 9mo ago
      And yet you didn't apologise for Obama not apologising for his wars, but you apologised for Obama shamelessly accepting Nobel Peace Prize after he did (and started new) wars. Yes, you are smart indeed. Here, have a cookie. You can call it the "Obama fan" cookie.

by vee-kay 9mo ago

netsharc 9mo ago

> Bottom line: > Yes — it is overwhelmingly likely (and effectively certain) that Obama knew he was overseeing active wars and new military escalations before he went to collect the Nobel Peace Prize. So your "assistant" supports my reply, he was fully aware of that and acknowledged this. And in the speech you didn't read, he went into how war came as naturally as the first man, and how some wars are necessary and "just". Indeed Ukraine is at the moment shooting back at Russian conscripts... And since we're allowing AI responses look at the answer of my second question: https://gemini.google.com/share/57839224db00 https://gemini.google.com/share/57839224db00 But I'm sure you would've been a better at politicking than Obama's team!

vee-kay 9mo ago
All Obama had to do - to have some modicum of respect by the world (despite him doing wars, but world already is accustomed to US being involved in wars, meh) - was to reject the Nobel Peace Prize. But he failed. And by doing the opposite, despite all his idealistic "humanitarian" speeches, he simply proved himself as a warmongering hypocrite to the world. In that aspect, Trump did try desperately to play "the Big Brother, the peacemaker" role in conflicts across the world, in an obvious (childish) attempt to outdo Obama's (dubious) legacy, but he failed. So he's dropped his mask, the velvet gloves are off, and it is every man (country) for himself (itself) as the King of the Hill decides which hill to stake his next flag on. Oily toy has been seemingly grabbed, and now the King has set his eyes Northwards. And that bodes ill for those who question his will. Because a troublemaker child may smash or throw some things when he has a temper tantrum.
- netsharc 9mo ago
  Your reply has proven my last sentence correct, and then some... Today I was listening to a podcast where the host said his internal monologue when a commenter on the Internet upsets him with a dumb comment is "you know what, they're probably 12 years old.". I think I'll adapt that idea. Because who else gets told A and immediately argues "Let me tell you, I'm sure Not A is correct/would've been the better move!", twice. Maybe someone who again didn't bother to read the links, because of course he's smarter than that, considering he's already smarter than Obama's team!
  - vee-kay 9mo ago
    And yet you didn't apologise for Obama not apologising for his wars, but you apologised for Obama shamelessly accepting Nobel Peace Prize after he did (and started new) wars. Yes, you are smart indeed. Here, have a cookie. You can call it the "Obama fan" cookie.