2 ms·
> but you can't even imagine framing that response in terms that don't include representatives of the state's monopoly on violence being within arms reach. Thi
by zahlman 10mo ago
> but you can't even imagine framing that response in terms that don't include representatives of the state's monopoly on violence being within arms reach.
This is not an accurate representation of GP:
> I don't stand in the checkout line trying to figure out how to run out without paying.... I trust that the vast, vast majority of people act similarly. If they didn't, no amount of law enforcement would be enough.
- XorNot 10mo agoThe OP is presenting a stupidly simplistic model of the problem, as though their regular middle class life ably answers the question of the role or threat of violence when demanding political change. In a world they note of police, military and security guards, they're acting like whether this might have a reason is determined solely by whether people are planning to steal from a supermarket or not...while they're not poverty stricken or hungry, to boot. Arguing "I simply obey all the laws" is real easy to do from a position of privilege. Violence is never the answer is easy to say when it's not happening to you. Its also easy to say while you stand by as violence is done to others.
- zahlman 10mo ago> Arguing "I simply obey all the laws" is real easy to do from a position of privilege. Poor Americans simply do not live in the Les Miserables world. > Violence is never the answer is easy to say when it's not happening to you. Its also easy to say while you stand by as violence is done to others. What violence are you even referring to?
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]