3 ms·
A quick search finds many COBOL checkers. I’d be very surprised if a modern model was not able to fix its own mistakes if connected to a checker tool. Yes, it m
by apaprocki 9mo ago
A quick search finds many COBOL checkers. I’d be very surprised if a modern model was not able to fix its own mistakes if connected to a checker tool. Yes, it may not be able to one shot it perfectly, but if it can quickly call a tool once and it “works”, does it really matter much in the end? (Maybe it matters from a cost perspective, but I’m just referring to it solving the problem you asked it to solve.)
Clearly it isn’t just “broken” for everyone, “Claude Code modernizes a legacy COBOL codebase”, from Anthropic:
https://youtu.be/OwMu0pyYZBc https://youtu.be/OwMu0pyYZBc
- shakna 9mo agoTaking Anthropic reporting on Anthropic, at face value, is not something you should really do. In this case, a five stage pipeline, built on demo environments and code that were already in the training data, was successful. I see more red flags there, than green.