3 ms·
It wouldn't impinge on freedom of speech. Nothing would be prohibited from being said. It would require conflicts of interest to be disclosed clearly. I.e. lab
by Nevermark 9mo ago
It wouldn't impinge on freedom of speech. Nothing would be prohibited from being said.
It would require conflicts of interest to be disclosed clearly. I.e. labelling speech incentivized by someone else (ad buyer) clearly, as not organic speech (the search engine results).
That is pro-transparency and ethics, not anti-speech.
- Marsymars 9mo ago> It would require conflicts of interest to be disclosed clearly. I.e. labelling speech incentivized by someone else (ad buyer) clearly, as not organic speech (the search engine results). That's specifically what I'm proposing in the post you replied to?
- Nevermark 9mo agoHa! You are correct, that you were correct. Thanks. I misread a sentence, missed your nuance, and then off to the races.