4 ms·
It isn't US specific and what goes into people's head is what propaganda wants it to be. Economics tell people the clear impact, but it doesn't make the news.
by hirako2000 9mo ago
It isn't US specific and what goes into people's head is what propaganda wants it to be.
Economics tell people the clear impact, but it doesn't make the news. We get fed with whatever the political influencers decide to tell us. Did the brits expect the consequence of brexit? No but that's because they deemed whatever the news said to be unreliable on this topic. Which for once happened to be true.
- PaulRobinson 9mo agoActually, it's pretty clear to those who have been paying attention that the main influence that swung the polls by about 4% from Remain to Leave in the last 2 days was a £10m advertising campaign on Facebook packed with lies, paid for by a Brexiteer who can't quite explain to the Electoral Commission where that money came from, but it did seem to just "appear" a few days after he allegedly met with the Russian ambassador to the UK. I'd get out more, but my tinfoil hat doesn't like the rain.
- bjelkeman-again 9mo agoIs it this one you are talking about? https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/public-statement-on-nca-investigation-into-suspected-eu-referendum-offences https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/public-statement...
- PaulRobinson 9mo agoPart of the picture, sure. I wonder where Rock Holdings Ltd got its money - PC Plod never really looked into that.
- youngtaff 9mo agoThere's also the unpublished report into Russian interference with the Brexit referendum and UK politics
- pixl97 9mo ago>Did the brits expect the consequence of brexit? I mean there were plenty of what would be considered intelligent people that laid out the exact consequences of brexit... problem is the masses don't seem to pay attention to well mannered intelligent people.