6 ms·
Protests can serve as an implied threat if the government is gaming the election process. They're certainly preferable to a riot or a coup attempt in that scena
by fc417fc802 10mo ago
Protests can serve as an implied threat if the government is gaming the election process. They're certainly preferable to a riot or a coup attempt in that scenario.
They also serve to draw attention to issues that aren't showing up on the ballot for whatever reason. The system doesn't always work in an ideal way. To that end protests are supposed to be annoying to those who don't care.
- immibis 10mo agoWhich is why they're illegal. Governments don't like being threatened.
- master-lincoln 10mo agoJust out of curiosity, where is that? Protests are legal in most of the world I think.