5 ms·
I think Obama winning the prize just for winning the election while being black was a very poor precedent to set.
by gizajob 9mo ago
I think Obama winning the prize just for winning the election while being black was a very poor precedent to set.
- fifilura 9mo agoThe Obama prize was a problem that haunts the committee. I agree But you are simplifying greatly. He got it because he reached out to Arabic leader to lower the tone set by George "crusader" Bush. "The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced the award on October 9, 2009, citing Obama's promotion of nuclear nonproliferation[2] and a "new climate" in international relations fostered by Obama, especially in reaching out to the Muslim world." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize Either way. Stating that you don't care about world peace because you didn't receive a prize. It is a bit childish. I would not let guy near something that requires responsibility. You win some you lose some. Get on with life.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- rjrjrjrj 9mo agoI think the US electing a convicted criminal as President was a very poor precedent to set.
- moogly 9mo agoHenry Kissinger though?