> So you can push other parts more if that makes sense: top cyclists can do 400-600 W sustained or 1-2 kW in short sprints. Very few people are top cyclists, o

> So you can push other parts more if that makes sense: top cyclists can do 400-600 W sustained or 1-2 kW in short sprints. Very few people are top cyclists, or top anything else. Top cyclists are doing it as a sport, not as a means of transport. > Anyway, from the CO2 perspective, biking vs walking is splitting hairs really I agree. I am responding to people who are claiming it is better than walking to a significant extent.