3 ms·
The bill was almost the same before the vote. A single vote or a single person decide nothing. The candidates were selected and the vote was driven where it had
by bigbadfeline 10mo ago
The bill was almost the same before the vote. A single vote or a single person decide nothing. The candidates were selected and the vote was driven where it had to be by those with real power over the the two parties, there was no real choice. What you see now would happen regardless of who the public voted for.
- phs318u 10mo ago> What you see now would happen regardless of who the public voted for. No. If Biden had attempted even a tenth (or Obama a hundredth) of what Trump has done, he’d be facing Nixon-level approbation and possibly real jail time.
- cudgy 10mo agoBiden caused much harm as well, but he was not as overt as Trump. Trump reveals it out loud while Biden (and most politicians) said it in secret chambers.
- fritzorino 10mo ago[flagged]
- defrost 10mo agoI'm sure you could express that viewpoint without what come across as deeply personal swipes. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- Imustaskforhelp 10mo agoI don’t know what could possess someone to say Biden was just as bad as trump. It’s self evidently false They mention that its self evidence but there is genuine evidence for this as well (which report do you want?) and its a fact and not deeply personal swipes. Your comment on the other hand feels like not addressing the main points of what the GP said and much more like a smokescreen to this.
- defrost 10mo agoHave you read the guidelines for this site (see link). If users, particularly green accounts, have opinions then they are encouraged to express them without snark directed toward the person they are replying to. My comment addresses following the guidelines.
- Imustaskforhelp 10mo agoWell I guess its understable that you might think its snark partially perhaps because of the fact that they said self evidence. I do understand what you are trying to say but their point still stands in my opinion and if you want me to provide facts from real studies indicating what they mention as self evidence. I am more than happy to do so to have a more nuanced but still civil discussion. but also the fact is that most of such rules kind of (soft break) during times of chaos as such and I do know that you understand it as well. You could've also done a better job trying to explain why you feel its snarky as I had assumed that you are trying to show the rules in case any uncomfortable facts comes up (which I hope you aren't doing as my civil response might go to waste in that case)
- defrost 10mo agoCould you explain to whom you believe these two snippets > sounds like the conspiratorial ramblings of someone who desperately wants to seem in the know. > But just ends up looking like a moron. are tangentially directed towards ? Do you believe that these are aligned with the HN guidelines?
- cudgy 10mo ago[flagged]
- fritzorino 10mo agoTrump’s unique awfulness in American and world history is indeed self evident and in forty year’s time nobody will ever admit to having voted for him, including you.
- cudgy 10mo agoTrump is an awful character, but equating him to the worst villains of history (at this point in time) is dishonest and hyperbolistic. Also, assuming you know who I voted for is equally silly.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- fritzorino 10mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- dang 10mo agoPlease don't break the site guidelines like this, regardless of how wrong another commenter is or you feel they are. We end up banning such accounts. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.