4 ms·
I do have expertise in Go. The bug was real, and the fix makes sense (though I couldn't verify it, of course). I just hope HN gets over the "but it might be AI
by LatencyKills 9mo ago
I do have expertise in Go. The bug was real, and the fix makes sense (though I couldn't verify it, of course).
I just hope HN gets over the "but it might be AI!!" crap sooner rather than later and focuses on the actual content because these types of posts are never going away.
- tim-kt 9mo agoPersonally, I just don't like the way this is written. As I said though, I am not an expert and so I may be outside the target group. I think that the original "this is AI" comment is an automatic response which alternatively carries the meaning "this is low-effort" and in that sense I still think that it is valid criticism.
- LatencyKills 9mo agoFair enough - I appreciate your thoughts. I'll keep the "this is low-effort" == "this is AI" equivalence in mind moving forward.
- ilogik 9mo agoI've done a similar fix, even a bit more interesting, however I wouldn't consider it worthy of writing a blog post, not to mention submitting it to HN.
- vuciuc 9mo agoEven the part where they deploy new code to production without restarting processes?