3 ms·
How can anyone even trust crap like this? It was only a few days ago Claude and ChatGPT hallucinated a bunch of stuff from actual docs I sent them links to. Whe
by lloydatkinson 9mo ago
How can anyone even trust crap like this? It was only a few days ago Claude and ChatGPT hallucinated a bunch of stuff from actual docs I sent them links to. When asked about it, they just apologised.
- mpalmer 9mo agoSynthesizing 500 words at a time into digestible topics is significantly less prone to error. You're giving it a lot of info and asking for an organized subset. It's good at following such direction. In your example, you're doing the inverse (give me a lot of text based on a little), and that's where LLMs have no problem hallucinating the new information.
- alansaber 9mo agoExactly the more tightly scoped the problem the less stochastic noise. Even better if you can add more signals based on deterministic algorithms like keyword presence etc. It gets very domain-specific very fast