3 ms·

Dr Raoult was very vocal in France about hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for covid 19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Raoult https://en.wikipedia.org/w

Dr Raoult was very vocal in France about hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for covid 19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Raoult https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Raoult It seems today that he was just wrong and used to make "dubious" clinical trials. > As of 2025, 46 of Raoult's research publications have been retracted, and at least another 218 of his publications have received an expression of concern from their publishers, due to questions related to ethics approval for his studies.

thrance 9mo ago
In this case, he was actually spreading misinformation. Anyone with two braincells could see it at the time.
- whynotmaybe 9mo ago
  > Anyone with two braincells could see it at the time. It seems a captain obvious now but it wasn't so at the time. (Or maybe my.braincells.count() < 2) Many people listened because he wasn't some youtuber doing his research, he was the head of the "Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit" ad the Faculty of Medicine of Marseille. I've watched one of his interviews where he stated that people survived in his unit with hydroxychloroquine and that he had numbers to prove it. When you look at his credentials, and my.braincells.count(), it was hard to identify it as misinformation.
  - thrance 9mo ago
    I definitely exaggerated with my "two braincells". Even the french president said about the guy "we need more people like him" (although I wouldn't say he's that smart himself...). But even without being knowledgeable about statistics, there were a lot of very serious people giving very good arguments against his results. You just had to see them. And seeing all the Facebook doctors lunatics instantly side with Raoult and defend him tooth and nail should definitely raise some red flags...
agumonkey 9mo ago
Raoult's case is so strange.. he's not the usual fringe doctor, up until covid, he had a center seat in national health institution and everybody around him was listening. I still don't get why nobody was wary of him there..

thrance 9mo ago

In this case, he was actually spreading misinformation. Anyone with two braincells could see it at the time.

whynotmaybe 9mo ago
> Anyone with two braincells could see it at the time. It seems a captain obvious now but it wasn't so at the time. (Or maybe my.braincells.count() < 2) Many people listened because he wasn't some youtuber doing his research, he was the head of the "Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit" ad the Faculty of Medicine of Marseille. I've watched one of his interviews where he stated that people survived in his unit with hydroxychloroquine and that he had numbers to prove it. When you look at his credentials, and my.braincells.count(), it was hard to identify it as misinformation.
- thrance 9mo ago
  I definitely exaggerated with my "two braincells". Even the french president said about the guy "we need more people like him" (although I wouldn't say he's that smart himself...). But even without being knowledgeable about statistics, there were a lot of very serious people giving very good arguments against his results. You just had to see them. And seeing all the Facebook doctors lunatics instantly side with Raoult and defend him tooth and nail should definitely raise some red flags...

agumonkey 9mo ago

Raoult's case is so strange.. he's not the usual fringe doctor, up until covid, he had a center seat in national health institution and everybody around him was listening. I still don't get why nobody was wary of him there..