3 ms·
> Features > Ethical attack simulations Interesting. What makes these attack simulations ethical?
by chrisjj 10mo ago
> Features
> Ethical attack simulations
Interesting. What makes these attack simulations ethical?
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- evanjrowley 10mo agoMorality("ethical"); Note: picking the wrong value here may result in undefined behavior. /s
- chrisjj 10mo agoCoo. Computers never cease to amaze me! :)
- CzaxTanmay 10mo agoYeah I also love computers Just check it out I will be happy if you make any changes to Cyber+ including adding new commands
- CzaxTanmay 10mo agoBro, Even a knife can be used for 2 purposes Hurting anyone(bad) or using it for cutting vegetables(good, I think)
- chrisjj 10mo agoI's say that's one purpose from two opposite viewpoints - wielder and vegetable.
- CzaxTanmay 10mo agoFair point. By “ethical” I’m referring to the intended and documented usage — authorized testing, education, and defensive simulations. Like any security tool, it can be misused, but Cyber+ is designed and presented around consent-based scenarios rather than real-world exploitation
- CzaxTanmay 10mo agoBy “ethical attack simulations,” I mean simulations intended for defensive security testing, education, and controlled lab environments (e.g. local machines, intentionally vulnerable targets, or systems you own or have permission to test). Cyber+ itself doesn’t try to enforce morality in code; instead, it focuses on transparency and explicitness so it’s clear what an action does. Like most security tooling, ethical use depends on authorization, scope, and intent rather than the language alone. I’m open to improving the wording if “ethical attack simulations” feels misleading or too vague. Try Cyber+ out. I will be very happy if you'll help by giving me some syntax ideas.