Is it normal for one party to intentionally misrepresent facts in this way, on the record? Maybe the source material (that TFA compares) was unavailable when th

Is it normal for one party to intentionally misrepresent facts in this way, on the record? Maybe the source material (that TFA compares) was unavailable when the statements were made, and were then produced as part of discovery (revealing the misrepresentation)? Reminds me of a toddler with candy all over their face denying eating it. (Not trying to say E is a toddler)