3 ms·
I mean, sure, but you're basically saying "anything other than the absolute top-end displays are absolutely awful". 133 PPI is going to be higher pixel density
by Marsymars 9mo ago
I mean, sure, but you're basically saying "anything other than the absolute top-end displays are absolutely awful". 133 PPI is going to be higher pixel density than >99% of desktop monitors that people are actually using.
e.g. The Steam hardware survey only goes down to 0.23% usage, and doesn't have any >4K resolution listed.
- plorkyeran 9mo agoIt’s a $3000 monitor, so yeah, other top end monitors are what I’m going to compare it to.
- Marsymars 9mo agoYou said 4K@33" is "awful". That's not $3k territory, that's what you get for $300.