That matches what we’ve seen too. Reliability seems to come from tightening the scope of each step, not from making the agent itself more sophisticated. The in

That matches what we’ve seen too. Reliability seems to come from tightening the scope of each step, not from making the agent itself more sophisticated. The intent boundary is the key thing for us. Rather than reasoning about an agent end to end, Keypost evaluates policy at a single tool call or pipeline step. If that step is narrow, enforcement stays simple and failures are easier to understand. Putting those constraints in the pipeline instead of inside each agent has held up better for us as agents change over time. How are you scoping intent in GTWY today?