4 ms·
I don't like it. It's lying in order to capture more market value than they're entitled to. The ends do not justify the means. This is a criticism.
by themafia 10mo ago
I don't like it. It's lying in order to capture more market value than they're entitled to. The ends do not justify the means. This is a criticism.
- emp17344 10mo agoBasically, fraud. Low-level fraud, but still fraud.
- csomar 10mo agoLow-level fraud? It’s used to raise billions that could have been used for other purposes.
- nerdponx 10mo agoFraud is just marketing in the 2020s now.
- skciva 10mo agoI'm not a fan of this either but I fail to see how its much different than the happy path tech demos of old.
- drawfloat 10mo agoThe happy path was functional.
- horsawlarway 10mo agoMmm, as someone forced to write a lot of last minute demos for a startup right out of school that ended up raising ~100MM, there's a fair bit of wiggle room in "Functional". Not that I would excuse Cursor if they're fudging this either - My opinion is that a large part of the growing skepticism and general disillusionment that permeates among engineers in the industry (ex - the jokes about exiting tech to be a farmer or carpenter, or things like https://imgur.com/6wbgy2L https://imgur.com/6wbgy2L) comes from seeing first hand that being misleading, abusive, or outright lying are often rewarded quite well, and it's not a particularly new phenomenon.
- drawfloat 10mo agoBut this isn’t wiggle room, it flat out doesn’t compile or run.
- horsawlarway 9mo agoYes. Very naive to assume the demos do. The worst of them are literal mockups of a feature in the same vein as figma... a screenshot with a hotzone that when clicked shows another screenshot that implies a thing was done, when no such thing was done.