2 ms·
And no extra charge to have an adjustable stand! How do they make money?
by smilebot 10mo ago
And no extra charge to have an adjustable stand! How do they make money?
- jdc0589 10mo agoits probably a charity, no money there.
- DustinEchoes 10mo agoNo need to recoup R&D costs.
- joshstrange 10mo agoBy having fewer pixels, lower quality screens? Crazy what you can do when you cut corners. This screen reminds of when I did tech support in high school and I helped a guy who bragged about his computer monitor, it was a TV running at 720p (if not lower) and a massive screen. The windows start bar was hilariously large (as were all UI elements), I had to just smile and nod until I got out of there. Sure, your screen may be bigger but it's blurry and everything is scaled way too large.
- semi-extrinsic 10mo ago> everything is scaled way too large The HiDPI/Retina bullshit is just bullshit. I've been running a 4K 43" 4:3 display at 100% scaling since 2018. It is neither blurry nor scaled too large. It can, however, comfortably fit 10 A4 pages simultaneously. Or 4 terminals + a browser + a PDF reader.
- joshstrange 10mo agoMy comment (or at least that quote) was specifically about someone using a 30"+ TV at 720p as their computer monitor.
- ggm 10mo agoMy arithmetic nodule is having a konniption fit. Does not compute. If this is 16:9 and you mistook your aspect ratio I can breathe again. √2:1 says 1.41:1 isn't 1.33:1 10 A4 pages do not fill a 4:3 or 3:4 aspect ratio box. They don't fill a 16:9 box either but it's more plausible, the wastage is different.
- qotgalaxy 10mo ago[dead]
- craftkiller 10mo ago> By having fewer pixels I thought samdixon was referencing the Apple Pro Display XDR? If so, Apple has fewer pixels. Apple Pro XDR: 6016 x 3384 Kuycon G32P: 6144 x 3456