2 ms·

> many of these still tools charge $70–$200+ per month, despite largely being wrappers around the same underlying data providers That is business. You should b

> many of these still tools charge $70–$200+ per month, despite largely being wrappers around the same underlying data providers That is business. You should be charging a premium for features that companies would like to use, that's one of the first rules of B2B.

JimsonYang 10mo ago
That’s an awesome point. I think it's an aversion on my end to charge a higher price. Partly because it's still a pretty green field so there’s a lot that hasn’t been built yet- features that companies would like to use and we would charge for. Will we charge a premium in the future? Yeah, but only where we’re confident there’s real ROI and have a great product to back that. For instance, AI attribution in this space is incredibly difficult right now. And in my opinion, without hard numbers (revenue, sign-ups, conversions, etc.), I can’t justify asking for premium pricing. Maybe I'm thinking about it wrong tho and making excuses for myself, I think you have a good point
- chupchap 10mo ago
  You could create a separate pricing for demanding businesses that need to track multiple products/brands that come under its umbrella, while retaining the existing pricing for smaller businesses and individuals