> If this much effort were being put into writing about government policy I'd totally agree with you, but this level of detail is uncharacteristic even for Wiki

> If this much effort were being put into writing about government policy I'd totally agree with you, but this level of detail is uncharacteristic even for Wikipedia. Honestly, I think you're very much underestimating how much Wikipedia writes about government policy - but perhaps more to the point, it's trivial to find articles about controversies regarding the "other side" that are also quite well furnished, e.g.: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_tan_suit_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_tan_suit_controve... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let%27s_Go_Brandon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let%27s_Go_Brandon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Did_That https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Did_That! - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_White_House_cocaine_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_White_House_cocaine_incid... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Township_High_School_District_211_transgender_student_locker_room_access_controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Township_High_School_District_... - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_name_Geronimo_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_name_Geronimo_controversy So I don't think there's much of an argument to say that they're being particularly biased in doing this (you might believe that none, or almost none of these articles at all should exist, but that's a different issue).