Another victory notch for the "AI Influentist" article[1]. Step 1: thought leader reveals Shocking(tm) AI achievement Step 2: post gets traction Step 3: addi

Another victory notch for the "AI Influentist" article[1]. Step 1: thought leader reveals Shocking(tm) AI achievement Step 2: post gets traction Step 3: additional context is revealed, dragging the original claim from the realm of the miraculous to "merely" useful. I don't think Mitchell intentionally misrepresented/exaggerated, but the phenomenon is reccuring. What's the logical explanation for the frequency? 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623195 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623195