> Perhaps in the future, humans won't have to work that much, I think that this is the fairytale part that I have trouble accepting. Coming from a country tha

> Perhaps in the future, humans won't have to work that much, I think that this is the fairytale part that I have trouble accepting. Coming from a country that has a very limited social welfare system I don't believe that the political or social climate is adapted to take such steps in a future where a lot of things are automated. It goes against everything that we've seen in the last 150 years. > Artists will be able to continue performing live, which will act as a huge filter for the AI-generated content and keep paying them. Or AI "musicians" will play live events as holograms. > Aside from that I agree, though musicians just one of many groups disrupted by AI and I wouldn't say they'll be the ones hurt most by it, mostly because they can continue to "exist" outside of the Internet, and experiencing music live could become more popular behind it. Sure, they might not be the most affected by AI, but they would still be affected which is the reason I'm not a fan of AI in music. This pushback doesn't need to be reserved to the most impacted activities.