2 ms·
Nope, Claim 2 is for a tertiary pointer as well. Your attempt to patent a triply-sequenced linked-list would be rejected as insufficiently innovative. Unlike t
by gnat 14y ago
Nope, Claim 2 is for a tertiary pointer as well. Your attempt to patent a triply-sequenced linked-list would be rejected as insufficiently innovative. Unlike the patent in question. cough
- Tipzntrix 14y agoDamn, guess I have to step it up one more level and put a fourth pointer on there...