4 ms·
I am making an app in Elixir. 100% of code is made by Claude. It is damn good at making "blocks". However, Elixir seems to be a langage that works very well
by malka1986 9mo ago
I am making an app in Elixir.
100% of code is made by Claude.
It is damn good at making "blocks".
However, Elixir seems to be a langage that works very well for LLM, cf. https://elixirforum.com/t/llm-coding-benchmark-by-language/72634 https://elixirforum.com/t/llm-coding-benchmark-by-language/7...
- redfloatplane 9mo agoHmm, that benchmark seems a little flawed (as pointed out in the paper). Seems like it may give easier problems for "low-resource" languages such as Elixir and Racket and so forth since their difficulty filter couldn't solve harder problems in the first place. FTA: > Section 3.3: > Besides, since we use the moderately capable DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite to filter simple problems, the Pass@1 scores of top models on popular languages are relatively low. However, these models perform significantly better on low-resource languages. This indicates that the performance gap between models of different sizes is more pronounced on low-resource languages, likely because DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite struggles to filter out simple problems in these scenarios due to its limited capability in handling low-resource languages. It's also now a little bit old, as with every AI paper the second they are published, so I'd be curious to see a newer version. But, I would agree in general that Elixir makes a lot of sense for agent-driven development. Hot code reloading and "let it crash" are useful traits in that regard, I think