2 ms·
"by American standards" is doing a lot of lifting. On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd give SF about a 4 compared to cities like Tokyo, Paris, Berlin, London, Amsterdam,
by socalgal2 10mo ago
"by American standards" is doing a lot of lifting. On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd give SF about a 4 compared to cities like Tokyo, Paris, Berlin, London, Amsterdam, Seoul, Singapore, ...
- jnathsf 10mo agoCaltrain is no slouch - punctual, clean, safe, really good wifi, electric.
- lazide 10mo agoIt also doesn’t get you around the city (and isn’t near any significant number of schools). It is good for getting in and out, assuming you already have a way of getting to the Caltrain station which isn’t exactly in the center of the city.
- teaearlgraycold 10mo agoEventually Caltrain will go to Salesforce tower
- Jensson 10mo agoThat is the baseline, not a high bar.
- mapotofu 10mo agoI don’t understand the boosters saying BART and Caltrain are good systems. When I lived there, and part of the reason I left, those systems were frequently delayed, full of drug addicts, and they lacked comprehensive service throughout SF, requiring dependence on Muni, which is worse than the other 2. I don’t think those who say this is a great system have been exposed to how other places in the world handle these things.
- gundmc 10mo agoI've never experienced any of these on Caltrain in the last ~10 years, for what it's worth.
- Aloisius 10mo agoReally? You haven't seen frequent delays in the last decade? Not even for the (sadly) semi-regular pedestrian fatalities that happen once or twice a month? Those usually delay trains for over an hour. Caltrain's own reports say there are hundreds of late trains every month.
- dietr1ch 10mo agoMaybe you were the drug addict?
- teaearlgraycold 10mo ago1. I live and work around BART stations so it works well for me 2. I just ignore the drug addicts 3. The delays are there but it all works well enough to be very useful