3 ms·
Why would it have been stopped? I don't see anything non-factual, and I regularly pass by that tree. It is well known and referenced [1]. [1] https://www.thear
by 317070 9mo ago
Why would it have been stopped? I don't see anything non-factual, and I regularly pass by that tree. It is well known and referenced [1].
[1] https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/07/hampstead-heaths-notorious-gay-cruising-spot-recreated-for-london-exhibition https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/07/hampstead-heaths-...
- y-curious 9mo agoHow does this work, practically, since it’s so notorious? Is there a queue of dudes waiting to get access to this “private” tree?
- bee_rider 9mo agoI wonder if it has been ruined by becoming well known. It is sort of funny—based on the Wikipedia they put up notices to stop people from having sex there, which didn’t work. They should have advertised it instead, maybe, the surest way of ruining something niche is to let everybody know about it.
- esperent 9mo ago"slender trunk which facilitates gay sex" You don't see the euphemism?
- wongarsu 9mo agoI don't see it. It's a tree that people have sex on. Gay sex, though from the looks of it the tree would be equally well suited for lesbian or straight sex. Presumably one person lies on their stomach on the trunk while one or more people perform penetrative acts. Where is the euphemism? And what is weird about listing this on wikipedia?