3 ms·
How effective would this setup be if the parent company in the US is ordered to order the EU subsidiary to do something not in the interests of the EU?
by electronsoup 9mo ago
How effective would this setup be if the parent company in the US is ordered to order the EU subsidiary to do something not in the interests of the EU?
- crazygringo 9mo agoIf it breaks the law in the EU, then the European employees staffing the data center refuse, because they don't want to go to jail or pay fines. That's the entire point of setting it up like this. Think of it like fast-food franchises. They have to sell the same food and use the same branding and charge the same prices. But if McDonald's tells you to start selling cocaine on the side, you tell them nope, that's not in the contract and I don't feel like going to prison.
- nikeee 9mo agoWhat if the software is developed and potentially backdoored in the US and deployed by the EU team in the sovereign region? Or did they rewrite the entire AWS stack?
- crazygringo 9mo agoI don't think there are any protections against that. On the other hand, you'd have to ask yourself how realistic it is that the US is forcing Amazon to secretly backdoor its own software for US spying abroad? I can't give an answer on that one, you'll have to form your own opinion. I imagine that if a back door were ever discovered, AWS's reputation would tank so hard that a lot of companies would probably never do business with it again.
- blibble 9mo ago> how realistic it is that the US is forcing Amazon to secretly backdoor its own software for US spying abroad? probably 100%?
- recursivecaveat 9mo agoOver 100%, in that I'm sure multiple independent groups are working on it all the time. The spooks regularly place actual agents in foreign governments (the Germans found a big nest of them and nothing much happened in the end). There's no way it would be challenging for them to find an employee willing to cash a giant cheque in exchange for quietly granting their own government access.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- bflesch 9mo agoMaybe you missed when Microsoft blocked the email account of the chief prosecutor of the international court of justice: https://www.heise.de/en/news/Criminal-Court-Microsoft-s-email-block-a-wake-up-call-for-digital-sovereignty-10387383.html https://www.heise.de/en/news/Criminal-Court-Microsoft-s-emai... Of course these services are backdoored.
- senderista 9mo agoHow is that a “backdoor”? It was just an (outrageous) administrative decision.
- trebligdivad 9mo agoIf the EU employees can look around the code, it would then get quite interesting if they were to point out a backdoor. which they would of course raise with an EU based CERT. In a way that protects US customers as well having a set that can't be stopped from doing that.
- jojobas 9mo agoAssuming EU employees get to see the sources, let alone own their building process.
- trebligdivad 9mo agoTrue, and there's probably a lot of it; still I think they already have some EU devs, but I guess only on some things.
- ironbound 9mo agoThere was a Microsoft email server legal case for Ireland that didn't go well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United_Stat...
- trebligdivad 9mo agoYeh I was curious how it was different - I thought MS did a similar thing of getting T-mobile to operate it's EU cloud.