4 ms·
I suspect some companies may already be considering it. Especially with the wealth of alternatives today.
by corvad 9mo ago
I suspect some companies may already be considering it. Especially with the wealth of alternatives today.
- nine_k 9mo agoWhat kind of alternatives do you see as viable for large(ish) commercial users?
- toephu2 9mo agoGitHub on-prem. Officially called GitHub Enterprise Server. You can have GitHub, but hosted on your own servers.
- NewJazz 9mo agoSo you still pay them, you do the hosting work, and you get a product with worse features than gitlab?
- zxcvasd 9mo agobut you can be smug when theres a github incident, and thats hard to put a price on
- NewJazz 9mo agoYou can do that with gitlab.
- johnisgood 9mo agoYeah, at that point why would anyone choose GitHub?
- bigfatkitten 9mo agoAnd it costs you more money than GitLab.
- g947o 9mo agoCompanies are already using on-premise GitHub server, if they are using GitHub in the first place. There are many other self hosted solutions which are quite common in enterprise environment.
- supriyo-biswas 9mo agoIn my experience companies are moving into GitHub for Copilot and GHA.
- appplication 9mo agoGHA maybe, but copilot is just another mid tier player in a congested space.
- NewJazz 9mo agoDoesn't stop folks from wanting to buy the MS brand. Execs are really out of touch these days.
- olyjohn 9mo agoThese days? lol
- ChromaticPanic 9mo agoIt's a cheap mid tier player. You get more tokens per dollar.