> It's always a statement 'to protect the children' or 'fight piracy' Both of which make a lot of sense. And the contrarian view is always expressed as a matt

> It's always a statement 'to protect the children' or 'fight piracy' Both of which make a lot of sense. And the contrarian view is always expressed as a matter of "privacy", as if remote privacy had ever existed before a couple decades ago. Laws must be discussed based on their intentions and their expected result. Inventing dogmas doesn't help societal advancement.