3 ms·
should have a fate similar to stackoverflow: less contributors, worse (or stale) content, less visits
by toinewx 9mo ago
should have a fate similar to stackoverflow: less contributors, worse (or stale) content, less visits
- altilunium 9mo ago[dead]
- jader201 9mo agoI’ll be curious to see how true this turns out to be. I stopped visiting SO frequently years ago, even before LLMs. But I still visit Wikipedia. I often just want to read about X, vs. asking AI questions about X.
- thmsths 9mo agoThis. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, while some of the content needs to be updated periodically, it also has A LOT of content that will stay relevant pretty much forever.
- fragebogen 9mo agoAccording to their own stats (visible in the graph some folds down), it seems to have a fairly steady rate of edits. As for visits, it looks quite constant as well https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/10/17/new-user-trends-on-wikipedia/ https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/10/17/new-user-trends-on-wik...
- lysace 9mo agoSo activity is plateauing.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]