3 ms·
A) The update is that it's been approved and is in the App Store now. B) It wasn't rejected because they said there's no In-App Purchase -- it was rejected t
by nlh 14y ago
A) The update is that it's been approved and is in the App Store now.
B) It wasn't rejected because they said there's no In-App Purchase -- it was rejected they said "or any of that nonsense."
This is pushing it as a story, really. The headline should read "Developer gets game rejected for calling IAP 'nonsense'" which shouldn't surprise anyone.
If I run a shop, you want to sell products in my shop, and you refer to one of my sales methods as 'nonsense', then I'm probably going to ask you to leave as well...
- epo 14y agoAbsolutely, a non-story. But will no doubt be leapt upon by fandroids and Apple haters as an example of Apple's corporate fascism. Apple's store, Apple's rules.